Open Optikx187 opened 2 years ago
Not sure this is a bug, The error comes from the server side from the combination of arguments. but cross referencing this with AWS docs everything looks in order and acceptance tests for PERSISTENT_2
look similar.
can you try combo of 1200 for storage capacity and 125 for unit? im curios if this fails for you as well. (as this combo passes in acceptance tests)
PERSISTENT_2 is not available in every region, see https://docs.aws.amazon.com/fsx/latest/LustreGuide/using-fsx-lustre.html near the bottom of the page.
If you try to create a PERSISTENT_2 filesystem in an unsupported region, you will get this error, regardless of the configured throughput per unit.
If you use the AWS console to create a Lustre FSx filesystem in a region where PERSISTENT_2 is unsupported and you choose the 'Persistent SSD' option,, you can choose between 50, 100 and 200 MB/s per TB, which are the documented values for PERSISTENT_1.
This screenshot is from the Stockholm (eu-north-1) region, that does not support PERSISTENT_2:
Marking this issue as stale due to inactivity. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If this issue receives no comments in the next 30 days it will automatically be closed. Maintainers can also remove the stale label.
If this issue was automatically closed and you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. Thank you!
Community Note
Terraform CLI and Terraform AWS Provider Version
Affected Resource(s)
Terraform Configuration Files
Debug Output
Panic Output
Expected Behavior
fsx lustr resource created
Actual Behavior
Terraform errors with:
Steps to Reproduce
terraform apply
Important Factoids
The AWS account is hosted in govcloud-west
References
0000