Closed andrewf78 closed 1 year ago
This functionality has been released in v3.56.0 of the Terraform Provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.
For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template. Thank you!
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.
Is there an existing issue for this?
Community Note
Terraform Version
1.4.6
AzureRM Provider Version
3.55.0
Affected Resource(s)/Data Source(s)
azurerm_orbital_contact_profile
Terraform Configuration Files
Debug Output/Panic Output
Attempting to parse a manually updated Link without an IP Address specified:
Expected Behaviour
The
Contact Profile
link should be allowed to be configured without an IP Address, for Virtual RF type Uplink channels only, as this connection is made over a UDP socket.Originally I had created the necessary resources via
terraform
, however for some "radio-in-the-loop" testing the Azure Orbital team had requested that we set theUplink IP Address
to empty. This is not possible viaterraform
, and changing it manually causes futureplan
operations to segfault (I would expect the change to be detected and reverted, but not for the provider to seg-fault)The Azure Orbital Documentation explains the desired configuration of a network, for this
virtual RF
+Uplink
use-case:Actual Behaviour
Referencing the error logs above:
1)
link.ip_address
is a required parameter, so one cannot create a resource in line with the desired configuration.2) If a
link
is manually changed to theemtpy/null
value,terraform
seg-faults on refreshing the state. (See: Debug/Panic output section)Steps to Reproduce
terraform plan
Important Factoids
A spacecraft object required Azure CS approval, among other requirements.
References
No response