`azurerm_cosmosdb_account` - update for TLS 1.0&1.1 retirement

ziyeqf commented 1 week ago

Community Note

Please vote on this PR by adding a :thumbsup: reaction to the original PR to help the community and maintainers prioritize for review
Please do not leave comments along the lines of "+1", "me too" or "any updates", they generate extra noise for PR followers and do not help prioritize for review

To deprecate 1.0 and 1.1 for minimum_tls_version per the announcement

[x] I have followed the guidelines in our Contributing Documentation.
[x] I have checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change.
[x] I have checked if my changes close any open issues. If so please include appropriate closing keywords below.
[x] I have updated/added Documentation as required written in a helpful and kind way to assist users that may be unfamiliar with the resource / data source.
[x] I have used a meaningful PR title to help maintainers and other users understand this change and help prevent duplicate work. For example: “resource_name_here - description of change e.g. adding property new_property_name_here”

[x] I have added an explanation of what my changes do and why I'd like you to include them (This may be covered by linking to an issue above, but may benefit from additional explanation).
[ ] I have written new tests for my resource or datasource changes & updated any relevent documentation.
[x] I have successfully run tests with my changes locally. If not, please provide details on testing challenges that prevented you running the tests.
[ ] (For changes that include a state migration only). I have manually tested the migration path between relevant versions of the provider.

draft to run tests

[x] My submission includes Test coverage as described in the Contribution Guide and the tests pass. (if this is not possible for any reason, please include details of why you did or could not add test coverage)

4.0 :

5.0:

As these failures shall not be caused by this PR, can we tolerate it?

Below please provide what should go into the changelog (if anything) conforming to the Changelog Format documented here.

This is a (please select all that apply):

[!NOTE] If this PR changes meaningfully during the course of review please update the title and description as required.

stephybun commented 1 day ago

Is this ready for review?

ziyeqf commented 10 hours ago

spent some time to get testing result, it's ready for review now