Please vote on this issue by adding a š reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment. If the issue is assigned to the "modular-magician" user, it is either in the process of being autogenerated, or is planned to be autogenerated soon. If the issue is assigned to a user, that user is claiming responsibility for the issue. If the issue is assigned to "hashibot", a community member has claimed the issue already.
Description
The feature of field-level access control should be supported via terraform provider. It is possible to restrict the access control of certain logging fields to a minimum of individuals . Especially for sensitive data, this option is very useful. Unfortunately the provider does not offer a functionality to do so for the logging bucket. My desired enhancement would be a equivalent to the gcloud command:
Community Note
Description
The feature of field-level access control should be supported via terraform provider. It is possible to restrict the access control of certain logging fields to a minimum of individuals . Especially for sensitive data, this option is very useful. Unfortunately the provider does not offer a functionality to do so for the logging bucket. My desired enhancement would be a equivalent to the gcloud command:
New or Affected Resource(s)
Potential Terraform Configuration
References
GCP Documentation - logging field-level access control
b/312911398