Closed gillcaleb closed 11 months ago
It's unclear to my why the license/cla check continues to remain in a pending state as I've gone through the signing process and verified its completion on my end. I've tried re-checking it numerous times but to no avail.
It's unclear to my why the license/cla check continues to remain in a pending state as I've gone through the signing process and verified its completion on my end. I've tried re-checking it numerous times but to no avail.
Usually that happens if your contributions are under a different account, ie, email. For example, I see that @stavvy-cgill is making the comments, but @gillcaleb is the commenter here. Try signing with your @stavvy-cgill account and that should fix it. Thanks!
It's unclear to my why the license/cla check continues to remain in a pending state as I've gone through the signing process and verified its completion on my end. I've tried re-checking it numerous times but to no avail.
Usually that happens if your contributions are under a different account, ie, email. For example, I see that @stavvy-cgill is making the comments, but @gillcaleb is the commenter here. Try signing with your @stavvy-cgill account and that should fix it. Thanks!
Thank you!
Hi team! Just wanted to check back in to get a sense for when this might get a review. Thanks!
Thanks for raising this - I'm ok with adding it but I want to make sure Kubernetes' alternative recommendations are made clear. LGTM once a few naming and documentation comments are addressed. Thanks for including the tests and schema update too!
Appreciate the feedback! I went ahead and added the suggested changes.
Thanks for opening the PR @gillcaleb! We ran in to the same thing today and were about to open a PR. Is anything blocking a release of that change?
Addresses #917
The intent of this PR is to allow for the creation of a long-lived API token for the server SA.