Closed Console closed 7 years ago
Can you post a screenshot of your task from the web panel "-a 3 -w 4 #HL#" does not look right to me.
When dealing with "special" characters in the commands you really should use hcchar files to reduce potential escape character confusion with the software.
Oh i see what you mean with "-a 3 -w 4 #HL#" hashcat should be using ?1?2?2?2?2?2?2?3?3?3?3?d?d?d?d by default. you really should be using a full mask with hashtopussy and not leave this blank.
run -a 3 -w 4 -1 ?l?d?u -2 ?l?d -3 ?l?d*!$@_ #HL# ?1?2?2?2?2?2?2?3?3?3?3?d?d?d?d as the attack command but put the special characters in a hcchar file
If you need an example -a3 -1?u?d -2?l?d?u -3 LowDigSp.hcchar #HL# ?1?2?2?2?2?2?2?3?3?3?3?d?d?d?d
Where LowDigSp.hcchar contains "?l?d*!$@_"
You also should not be using -w4 in the attack command.. -w should only be used per client in the client specific parameters... like --gpu-temp-disable etc.
Oh and as an added tip, -1 ?u?l?d contains [Space] whereas -1?u?l?d would not.
Ok, so here is another perfect example of hashcats Overflow feature. this is not exactly a hashtopussy "issue" this is hashcat telling you the keyspace you are trying to run is "unreasonable"
hashcat64.exe --keyspace -a 3 -1?l?d?u -2?l?d -3?l?d*!$@_ ?1?2?2?2?2?2?2?3?3?3?3?d?d?d?d
results in an overflow because this keyspace integer (result) is larger than 64bits and there for unreasonable to run.
you are welcome to read up on Atom's response to this here https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-6588.html?highlight=Overflow
Thanks for clearing that one up! :+1: and for the suggested improvements to my tasking too!
Apologies for raising a non-issue.
No no i would rather have you post a potential issue than not post at all. Thanks for using and testing our software!
Most likely, it is giving error because there is a very large integer in the database, for example unixtimestamp (milliseconds)
First issue. Attempting the task command: -a 3 -w 4 #HL# results in a stack trace from hashtopussy
Assuming this was down to not specifying a mask (though hashcat is meant to handle this due to having default values set as per: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=hashcat#default_values) I decided to specify the mask along with the custom character space required.
Which resulted in the following error message being reported by hashtopussy
No idea whats going on as the task command itself running using hashcat standalone works fine on the machine as is.