Closed sjakobi closed 5 years ago
I think this makes sense since Applicative has become a superclass of Monad.
What about monadApplicative though, which is somewhat redundant now? Deprecate it?
monadApplicative
(The same can be asked about monadFunctor. And applicative already contains the Functor-Applicative relationship.)
monadFunctor
applicative
bindApply should probably be handled in the same way as monadApplicative.
bindApply
I think this makes sense since Applicative has become a superclass of Monad.
What about
monadApplicative
though, which is somewhat redundant now? Deprecate it?(The same can be asked about
monadFunctor
. Andapplicative
already contains the Functor-Applicative relationship.)bindApply
should probably be handled in the same way asmonadApplicative
.