Closed davidsd closed 1 year ago
This is a good question. The construction that was there is a kind of "newtype" for a class. I believe it can be used in conjunction with various Dict
tricks, see for example here. However, I am kind of doubtful that users of Cloud Haskell are doing these things with Serializable
. In my experience, a type synonym and ConstraintKinds
is simpler, results in good type inference, and doesn't yield a bunch of GHC warnings.
It would be nice to have a better concrete understanding of what users are doing with Cloud Haskell. There aren't a huge number of reverse dependencies for distributed-process
that aren't part of the distributed-process-
family. Here's a list of them. Not sure what to do with this.
i'm leaning toward just mearging this and making the next big release a breaking change. WDYT?
I think that makes sense.
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 12:47 PM Joel McCracken @.***> wrote:
i'm leaning toward just mearging this and making the next big release a breaking change. WDYT?
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/haskell-distributed/distributed-process/pull/364#issuecomment-982008723, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABZCII4AQVH2WERJ74ZC3DUOPRGNANCNFSM5HTHOKOA . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675 or Android https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub.
By now, other people have submitted pull requests to move to later GHC versions, and master has moved on. I still don't know what the effects of switching Serializable to a type synonym might be, so I'm going to just close this. Maybe I'll get a chance to ask an expert at some point.
I wish i knew if there'd be any consequences to switching serializable to a type synonym