Like Aeson allows a preprocessing function to be specified for record field names we need one for Cassava. Otherwise, for example, I will hardly ever be able to the generic deriving machinery. (Sorry if I missed another issue covering this, or indeed a way of gaining such control — not for a want of trying.)
Like Aeson allows a preprocessing function to be specified for record field names we need one for Cassava. Otherwise, for example, I will hardly ever be able to the generic deriving machinery. (Sorry if I missed another issue covering this, or indeed a way of gaining such control — not for a want of trying.)