Open nh2 opened 1 year ago
Some confusion: Some PRs such as https://github.com/haskell-numerics/random-fu/pull/91/files fix only other packages and don't fix random-source
, that one still has base >= 4 && <4.16
.
That said, https://github.com/haskell-numerics/random-fu/pull/82/files is supposed to add ghc9.2.2. compatibility, which has base-4.16.1.0
, which is incompatible with the above constraint.
Should random-source
work here?
Looks like https://github.com/haskell-numerics/random-fu/commit/82d8fb17f4fc752802da703e2da711051cc2228e is some hint on transition paths away from random-source
. See also https://github.com/haskell-numerics/random-fu/pull/67
I can look at this tomorrow - I was away in Australia for a few weeks
I have remembered some of the history. random-source
is deprecated and you should use random
or mwc-random
or potentially anything else that supports the StatefulGen
typeclass (e.g. https://hackage.haskell.org/package/mwc-random-0.15.0.2/docs/System-Random-MWC.html#g:1)
See also my thoughts from last year https://github.com/haskell-numerics/random-fu/issues/83#issuecomment-1193267644. Sadly I have made no progress on this although I do now have time. I think beefing up mwc-random
is going to be the simplest for now. So the idea would be you can use mwc-random
just for distributions and not the actual MWC algorithm.
I'd love to improve monad-bayes
to be the replacement for random-fu
but I don't have the time to do this.
Hi,
could you make a new Hackage release to https://hackage.haskell.org/package/random-source that includes the recently-merged upper bound fixes?
Also, on that page it says
Deprecated
, but without explanation.Could you either remove the deprecation, or add some details / info on what should be used instead?
Thanks and best greetings!