So, & is the fundamental construction operation, there is no way around using it. But it clashes with the flipped $ function application defined in base.Data.Function, that is extensively used, for instance, in diagrams, and elsewhere when a more "object oriented" feel is desirable.
Therefore, I propose that we have a synonymous name like insert that can be used when & of DynGraph conflicts with the more widely used & from base.
So,
&
is the fundamental construction operation, there is no way around using it. But it clashes with the flipped$
function application defined inbase.Data.Function
, that is extensively used, for instance, indiagrams
, and elsewhere when a more "object oriented" feel is desirable.Therefore, I propose that we have a synonymous name like
insert
that can be used when&
ofDynGraph
conflicts with the more widely used&
from base.