Closed jberthold closed 8 years ago
Thanks, having a smaller file would indeed be more convenient but I'd prefer to have this merged in after my changes are in - that should reduce the amount of merge conflicts.
Sure, no problem - (although I don't think there would be any issue with conflicts in this patch).
I should have some time this week to look into rebasing this. I cannot see just where the conflict is lurking from the Web UI but I believe it should be straightforward. Who would be inclined to take care of merging this? @Mikolaj ?
Yep, should be fairly straightforward. My hunch is that the conflict's gonna be within the .cabal file and/or TestVersions.hs
because they got changed after this PR was submitted. Mikolaj's currently on holiday I believe, but I'll merge the PR as soon as the conflicts are resolved.
OK, this PR is now rebased (and amended to fit the new parser which sorts events by timestamp).
Everything is looking fine and behaviour appears to be the same as with the longer test, so I'm merging this.
Thanks for the PR!
Thank you guys!
This is a smaller test for the parallel RTS events (might also be helpful for @kvelicka as a second test file).