Open juhp opened 1 year ago
With dynamic
it seems okay, but that makes the packaging rather more complex...
Though I suppose dynamic
is preferred for TH etc, right?
@juhp It is strongly recommended you build dynamically linked HLS releases as this works much better with projects with TH.
Okay, thanks - I have to consider this - it is a major packaging change.
Okay yes I see the official binaries are dynlinked. Me being lazy again...
@juhp It is strongly recommended you build dynamically linked HLS releases as this works much better with projects with TH.
I've tried to find evidence of this some time ago by getting a clear reproducer. But I couldn't.
Do you have any?
I am hitting linking errors on Fedora aarch64 when building HLS 1.9 for Fedora for ghc9.0 and ghc9.2:
see https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/petersen/haskell-language-server/monitor/ (edit: plus https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/petersen/haskell-language-server/build/5197512/)
Your environment
Fedora Linux
Steps to reproduce
Basically using cabal install but you can see the exact steps: https://github.com/fedora-haskell/haskell-language-server/blob/main/haskell-language-server.spec#L409
Expected behaviour
HLS 1.9 to build and link on aarch64
Actual behaviour
Linking fails with many:
/usr/bin/ld.gold: error: Stub is too far away, try a smaller value for '--stub-group-size'. The current value is 0x7ffbffc.
Debug information
Build logs are available starting from the above link.
Has anyone else hit something like this before? I have been building with
dynamic False
since 1.6.This could well be a ghc issue: feels like HLS pushes it limits...