Closed andreasabel closed 6 months ago
Should this bound on sorted-list be dropped in the test-suite? https://github.com/haskell/lsp/blob/9bab6d11098fbd74e908b63d9220e23eec75911e/lsp/lsp.cabal#L135 There is already a bound in lsp which is inherited. Or why is this minor-version upper bound needed here?
sorted-list
test-suite
lsp
Note that I dropped it in revision 1 of lsp-2.3: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/lsp-2.3.0.0/revisions/ This is because Stackage nightly has 0.2.2 which was excluded here.
I agree there's no good reason for this, we should just drop it.
Should this bound on
sorted-list
be dropped in thetest-suite
? https://github.com/haskell/lsp/blob/9bab6d11098fbd74e908b63d9220e23eec75911e/lsp/lsp.cabal#L135 There is already a bound inlsp
which is inherited. Or why is this minor-version upper bound needed here?Note that I dropped it in revision 1 of lsp-2.3: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/lsp-2.3.0.0/revisions/ This is because Stackage nightly has 0.2.2 which was excluded here.