Closed Shimuuar closed 4 years ago
At the moment it's evaluated as exp (log x * z - x - logGamma (z+1)) which gives only 12 significant digits for large 100-1000 z.
exp (log x * z - x - logGamma (z+1))
When this issue fixed test invIGammaIsInverse should be updated too,
At the moment it's evaluated as
exp (log x * z - x - logGamma (z+1))
which gives only 12 significant digits for large 100-1000 z.