Open ch1bo opened 8 years ago
Thank you for your interest. I'll take a look at hdevtools
this weekend. However, I would not expect lots of activity regarding hasky-mode
, because I have less and less free time these days. hasky-extensions
was finished because it's small and I was tired of managing lists of extensions without decent automation.
Alright good to know. In fact the project came to my attention via a hasky-extensions post on /r/haskell, will try to give that a whirl as well.
Sent from TypeApp
On Aug 9, 2016, 5:13 PM, at 5:13 PM, Mark Karpov notifications@github.com wrote:
Thank you for your interest. I'll take a look at
hdevtools
this weekend. However, I would not expect lots of activity regardinghasky-mode
, because I have less and less free time these days.hasky-extensions
was finished because it's small and I was tired of managing lists of extensions without decent automation.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/hasky-mode/ideas/issues/2#issuecomment-238585534
Hi there,
I like your plans for
hasky-mode
as I recently switched to emacs (spacemacs) and do not (yet?) really like the haskell layer. It might improve upon some shortcomings ofhaskell-mode
using emacs packagesghc
(ghc-mod),haskell-snippets
,hident
,company-ghc
,company-cabal
and so on.After reading your ideas I thought
hdevtools
, in particularflycheck-hdevtools
, nicely aligns with your rationale and is a nice addition to the defaultflycheck
support for ghc, stack and hlint. Being the maintainer of the project, I just released version0.1.4.0
which greatly improves stack support (being the primary use case for most people).What do you think about it? I know and use haskell on a daily basis but - as said - pretty new on emacs and elisp. Any ideas how I could help out?