Closed hassanakbar4 closed 3 years ago
@henrik@levkowetz.com changed component from ` to
Base templates`
@henrik@levkowetz.com changed milestone from ` to
FixDatabase`
@henrik@levkowetz.com removed owner (was ``)
@rjsparks@nostrum.com commented
Going out on a limb and marking this obe
@rjsparks@nostrum.com changed status from new
to closed
@rjsparks@nostrum.com changed resolution from ` to
overtaken by events`
@rjsparks@nostrum.com edited the issue description
resolution_overtaken by events
type_cleanup
| by fenner@research.att.comThe use of a seperate table for irtf groups means that not only is the lookup complicated, some functionality is missing - e.g., if we want to track the irtf rg of an I-D, we could with an acronym in the group_acronym field, except we can't since they're in a different space. If we want to express conflicts with irtf rg's, we could with the acronym ID, except we can't since they're in a different space.
I don't see any win from using the seperate ID for the irtf acronym, and several disadvantages.
Issue migrated from trac:71 at 2021-10-29 15:27:23 +0500