Open hassanakbar4 opened 6 years ago
@{"email"=>"julian.reschke@gmx.de", "name"=>nil, "username"=>nil} commented
I agree that the formatter should handle that better.
In my formatter, it seems to work right, see file:///C:/projects/xml2rfc/v3test.html#n-referring-to-list-items.
@{"email"=>"julian.reschke@gmx.de", "name"=>nil, "username"=>nil} uploaded file xref-tests.xml
(23.6 KiB)
test case
@{"email"=>"julian.reschke@gmx.de", "name"=>nil, "username"=>nil} uploaded file xref-tests.txt
(14.9 KiB)
TXT produced by xml2rfc
@{"email"=>"julian.reschke@gmx.de", "name"=>nil, "username"=>nil} uploaded file xref-tests.html
(44.7 KiB)
sample HTML output from rfc2629.xslt
@{"email"=>"rjsparks@nostrum.com", "name"=>nil, "username"=>nil} _changed status from new
to under_review
_
@{"email"=>"rjsparks@nostrum.com", "name"=>nil, "username"=>nil} commented
This is OBE for v2, but there may still be an analogous enhancement to be made in v3.
component_vocabulary
type_enhancement
| by tte@cs.fau.deIn RFC terminology section, terms are usually defined via a hangText, eg: