Closed hassanakbar4 closed 2 years ago
@{"email"=>"henrik@levkowetz.com", "name"=>nil, "username"=>nil} commented
I think what would make sense here would be to at some point extend support backwards for earlier TLPs, but I don't expect that as part of the current work.
I don't think it's right to turn it into a warning in the general case; adding a switch to be more lenient in this respect could be a possibility.
@{"email"=>"henrik@levkowetz.com", "name"=>nil, "username"=>nil} changed priority from medium
to minor
@{"email"=>"henrik@levkowetz.com", "name"=>nil, "username"=>nil} changed status from new
to closed
@{"email"=>"henrik@levkowetz.com", "name"=>nil, "username"=>nil} changed resolution from ` to
wontfix`
@{"email"=>"henrik@levkowetz.com", "name"=>nil, "username"=>nil} commented
Resolving this as wontfix for now. A later work package may revisit this.
component_Version_3_cli_txt
resolution_wontfix
type_defect
| by miek@miek.nlI understand this error, but it is a bit annoying as I'm trying to parse older RFC documents under this new parser.
Should it be made a warning and just continue?
Issue migrated from trac:351 at 2021-10-20 18:26:54 +0500