template <typename R, typename T , typename U>
concept sort_concept = std::equality_comparable<T, U>
and std::copy_constructible<T>
and std::incrementable<T>
and std::indirectly_readable<T>
and std::swappable<T>
and std::strict_weak_order<R, T, U>;
(Side note: The space in T , appears also in the book.)
Afterwards, following function is defined:
void sort(sort_concept auto begin, sort_concept auto end);
Regarding sort_concept:
std::equality_comparable only has one template parameter. Did you intent to use std::equality_comparable_with<T, U> or maybe sentinel_for<T, U>?
Shouldn't you use std::indirect_strict_weak_order<R, T, U> instead of std::strict_weak_order<R, T, U>?
Why is it templated of both T and U? Wasn't there only one InIt on page 240 that we write this concept for?
The use of sort_concept auto in the definition of void sort(...) wont compile. The concept takes three arguments, but we only (implicitly) provide one argument.
On page 241 is following concept defined:
(Side note: The space in
T ,appears also in the book.)Afterwards, following function is defined:
sort_concept:std::equality_comparable_with<T, U>or maybesentinel_for<T, U>?std::indirect_strict_weak_order<R, T, U>instead ofstd::strict_weak_order<R, T, U>?TandU? Wasn't there only oneInIton page 240 that we write this concept for?sort_concept autoin the definition ofvoid sort(...)wont compile. The concept takes three arguments, but we only (implicitly) provide one argument.Label: 4.6: T.10