Closed skovhus closed 7 years ago
Yeah, I think that'd be nice 👍 Then we only configure route53 and cloudfront if the user has specified a domain name.
Not sure if we should even allow the name
parameter in the config file.
Let's keep it for a bit, I think there might still be some valid use cases for it :)
Consider if we should just create random s3 bucket names instead of make this step configurable. As bucket names are global there is a high chance of collisions... And if you want a fixed name you might have a domain.
Similar approach as
now
.Thoughts @mads-hartmann ?