Closed hatfullr closed 4 years ago
I'm not confident we really need this feature. If both the opacity files are physically accurate, then it should be okay. If they aren't, we probably shouldn't try to mask it.
Note that the cold and warm opacities were originally smoothed together.
In getOpacity.f, instead of having a cutoff point of Teff <= 1000 K to use the cold opacities, we should use some kind of transfer function like what is done for Rosseland and Planck opacities as seen in that same getOpacity function.