hats-finance / Intuition-0x538dbadc50cc87b281cd655f1edbc6ebda02a66a

The smart contracts of the Intuition protocol v1.
https://intuition.systems
Other
0 stars 1 forks source link

Incorrect misleading comment #22

Open hats-bug-reporter[bot] opened 1 week ago

hats-bug-reporter[bot] commented 1 week ago

Github username: -- Twitter username: -- Submission hash (on-chain): 0x8c960254d0aa57a27cd2e07be8072e322aa126b7c4006adf4562189ce45bb521 Severity: low

Description: Description\ cancelOperation() Natspec is not correct and misleading for code readers as regards to functionality. CancelOperation is used to cancel the operation but Natspec states execute a scheduled operation which is not correct.

Consider below changes:

-    /// @dev execute a scheduled operation
+    /// @dev cancel a scheduled operation
    ///
    /// @param operationId unique identifier for the operation
    /// @param data data to be executed
    function cancelOperation(bytes32 operationId, bytes calldata data) external onlyAdmin {
mihailo-maksa commented 6 days ago

The reported issue concerning the incorrect NatSpec comment for the cancelOperation() function has been reviewed. Here is our detailed perspective:

Enhancement Suggestion: The suggestion to correct the NatSpec comment for cancelOperation() to accurately reflect its functionality is a valid documentation improvement. Accurate comments are crucial for code readability and maintainability, ensuring that developers and auditors correctly understand the purpose and functionality of the code.

Impact Assessment: While this issue does not pose any security risk or functional problem, it does affect the clarity of the code. Correcting the comment will improve the documentation and help prevent misunderstandings for future developers and auditors.

Severity Assessment: Since this issue is purely a documentation correction and does not impact the functionality or security of the contract, it is classified as a low severity enhancement.

Conclusion: The correction of the misleading NatSpec comment is a useful documentation enhancement but does not qualify as a security vulnerability. Therefore, we consider this issue to be an enhancement rather than a bug.

Status: This issue is an enhancement.

Comment for the Reporter: Thank you for the documentation improvement suggestion. Correcting the NatSpec comment to accurately describe the cancelOperation() function enhances code readability and maintainability. However, since this does not pose a direct security vulnerability, we classify it as an enhancement. We can still consider a lower payout for this valid suggestion.

0xRizwan commented 15 hours ago

@mihailo-maksa This should be labelled as minor issue since enhancement were tagged earlier.