In Solidity, using >= or <= to compare against block.timestamp (alias now) may introduce off-by-one errors due to the fact that block.timestamp is only updated once per block and its value remains constant throughout the block's execution. If an operation happens at the exact second when block.timestamp changes, it could result in unexpected behavior. To avoid this, it's safer to use strict inequality operators (> or <). For instance, if a condition should only be met after a certain time, use block.timestamp > time rather than block.timestamp >= time. This way, potential off-by-one errors due to the exact timing of block mining are mitigated, leading to safer, more predictable contract behavior.
Github username: -- Twitter username: -- Submission hash (on-chain): 0x8b8b1f5a83a884203e202d43e55b44f7399a774dd193897c6e98a017b51f251e Severity: low
Description: Description
In Solidity, using
>=
or<=
to compare againstblock.timestamp
(aliasnow
) may introduce off-by-one errors due to the fact thatblock.timestamp
is only updated once per block and its value remains constant throughout the block's execution. If an operation happens at the exact second whenblock.timestamp
changes, it could result in unexpected behavior. To avoid this, it's safer to use strict inequality operators (>
or<
). For instance, if a condition should only be met after a certain time, useblock.timestamp > time
rather thanblock.timestamp >= time
. This way, potential off-by-one errors due to the exact timing of block mining are mitigated, leading to safer, more predictable contract behavior.Attachments
['160']