Open dcmgashcisco opened 11 months ago
Comment from Alan:
I would suggest some modifications to the terms. Perhaps:
Historic TACACS+: as defined in RFC 8907
The intention here is to say also that it's not just "TACACS+ without TLS", but it's historic and should not be used.
TACACS+TLS: TLS transport with TACACS+ as the application data
Perhaps "TACACS+ over TLS" instead of "TLS for TACACS+" ?
Comment from Alan:
I would suggest some modifications to the terms. Perhaps:
The intention here is to say also that it's not just "TACACS+ without TLS", but it's historic and should not be used.
Perhaps "TACACS+ over TLS" instead of "TLS for TACACS+" ?