Closed kevinresol closed 4 years ago
You're free of course to move it to haxetink. There might be a bit of confusion about how it relates to tink_geom2. Perhaps it would then be best to call it tink_geojson - if dealing with geojson is indeed its primary objective (which at least right now seems to be the case).
The primary goal is to actually ditch geojson (the json form is the source of all the problems)
Any other name suggestions?
tink_spatial?
a few cons of geojson
I created another lib for geometries. Data are just abstracts over
Array<Float>
and uses enum to distinguish them.https://github.com/why-haxe/why-geometry/tree/master/src/why/g2d
@back2dos if you wish, I can move that to haxetink