like it says, will need to talk it over as far as which is cheaper / easier to maintain. vercel based CDN I feel like I'd trust the asset performance and purging on new versions / correct headers being set better than whatever we're pushing internally
213 if we added a wc-providers.json file to the routine then these fallbacks and priority could be self defined and ship.
[ ] put in fallback for this right after psu one
[ ] version of script could support the wc-providers.json concept above
like it says, will need to talk it over as far as which is cheaper / easier to maintain. vercel based CDN I feel like I'd trust the asset performance and purging on new versions / correct headers being set better than whatever we're pushing internally
213 if we added a wc-providers.json file to the routine then these fallbacks and priority could be self defined and ship.