Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Wow -- good catch. We can definitely do this for 0.64.
Original comment by ffdixon@gmail.com
on 10 Mar 2010 at 11:20
The compiler option are:
debug = false
optimize = true
Here's the reference file:
http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/3/html/help.html?content=performance_06.html
Original comment by Me.S...@gmail.com
on 10 Mar 2010 at 11:22
Hi Denis,
I thought this was already the case. I mean, flex-config.xml already have
"<optimize>true</optimize>" and build.xml already contains debug="false"
I made few tests and if I put in build.xml debug="true", BigBlueButton.swf goes
from
(by default) 445ko to 675ko. So the default config is already ok, isn't it ?
DJP
Original comment by D...@architectes.org
on 28 Mar 2010 at 6:29
look into doing this next iteration
Original comment by ritza...@gmail.com
on 2 Apr 2010 at 7:51
Original comment by ritza...@gmail.com
on 31 May 2010 at 2:15
Original comment by ritza...@gmail.com
on 31 May 2010 at 2:16
The files on my local windows build end up being around ~1.5 mb for all swf
files
together. However on the VM when I build they are 3.5mb. I've set the
debug=false and
optimize=true in mxmlc options in build.xml but no luck. flex-config.xml also
has
debug=false and optimize=true.
I don't know what the difference is between compiling from Flex Builder and
compiling
on Linux. It makes the client almost 3 times as large which is a huge issue,
but I
don't know how to fix it.
Original comment by Me.S...@gmail.com
on 31 May 2010 at 5:36
if we can't get this fixed for 0.7, perhaps at least we could build them on
Windoze
for our packages? that way they don't end up huge. then we can figure out the
linux
compilation problem later.
Original comment by jeremyth...@gmail.com
on 31 May 2010 at 5:47
I agree. The least we could do is include the small swf binaries in the
distribution
for regular users.
Original comment by Me.S...@gmail.com
on 31 May 2010 at 6:00
Fixed. For reference:
http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/3/html/help.html?content=modular_4.html#191026
Original comment by Me.S...@gmail.com
on 24 Jun 2010 at 3:34
Original comment by Me.S...@gmail.com
on 24 Jun 2010 at 3:37
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
Me.S...@gmail.com
on 10 Mar 2010 at 10:55