hbmartin
commented
3 months ago @CodiumAI-Agent /review
Closed hbmartin closed 3 months ago
hbmartin
commented
3 months ago @CodiumAI-Agent /review
codecov[bot]
commented
3 months ago Attention: Patch coverage is 98.21429% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 94.96%. Comparing base (
5e5c3f7) to head (4977633).
| Files | Patch % | Lines |
|---|---|---|
| lib/spm_version_updates/git.rb | 94.73% | 1 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
CodiumAI-Agent
commented
3 months ago | ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5] | 2, because the changes are mostly focused on handling different URL formats for package repositories and removing redundant code. The logic is straightforward, and the modifications are well-scoped. |
| 🧪 Relevant tests | Yes |
| 🔍 Possible issues | Possible Bug: The `trim_repo_url` method removes the protocol and `.git` suffix from URLs, which might lead to incorrect URL handling if the repository URL contains these elements in other parts of the URL. |
| 🔒 Security concerns | No |
| relevant file | lib/spm_version_updates/plugin.rb |
| suggestion | Consider using a more robust URL parsing method to handle edge cases where `.git` or protocol identifiers appear in other parts of the URL. Ruby's URI module can parse and manipulate URLs more reliably. [important] |
| relevant line | repo_url.split("://").last.gsub(/\.git$/, "") |
| relevant file | lib/spm_version_updates/plugin.rb |
| suggestion | Ensure that `XcodeprojPathMustBeSet` is a defined exception and provides a clear error message to the user about the missing Xcode project path. This improves the user experience by providing a clear and actionable error message. [important] |
| relevant line | raise(XcodeprojPathMustBeSet) if xcodeproj_path.nil? |
| relevant file | lib/spm_version_updates/plugin.rb |
| suggestion | Replace direct `puts` calls with a more flexible logging mechanism to control the verbosity of the output. This allows users to enable or disable verbose logging as needed. [medium] |
| relevant line | puts(resolved_versions) |
| relevant file | spec/spm_version_updates_spec.rb |
| suggestion | Add more test cases to cover scenarios where the URL contains `.git` or protocol identifiers in different parts of the URL, not just at the beginning or end. This ensures the `trim_repo_url` method works correctly in all cases. [important] |
| relevant line | it "Does report new versions with ssh and/or .git URLs" do |
Utilizing extra instructionsThe `review` tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize. Examples for extra instructions: ``` [pr_reviewer] # /review # extra_instructions=""" In the 'possible issues' section, emphasize the following: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """ ``` Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable. |
How to enable\disable automation- When you first install PR-Agent app, the [default mode](https://pr-agent-docs.codium.ai/usage-guide/automations_and_usage/#github-app-automatic-tools-when-a-new-pr-is-opened) for the `review` tool is: ``` pr_commands = ["/review", ...] ``` meaning the `review` tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration. Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations |
Auto-labelsThe `review` tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR: - a `possible security issue` label, that detects possible [security issues](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/tr/user_description/pr_agent/settings/pr_reviewer_prompts.toml#L136) (`enable_review_labels_security` flag) - a `Review effort [1-5]: x` label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (`enable_review_labels_effort` flag) |
Extra sub-toolsThe `review` tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR. It is recommended to review the [possible options](https://pr-agent-docs.codium.ai/tools/review/#enabledisable-features), and choose the ones relevant for your use case. Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example: `require_score_review`, `require_soc2_ticket`, `require_can_be_split_review`, and more. |
Auto-approve PRsBy invoking: ``` /review auto_approve ``` The tool will automatically approve the PR, and add a comment with the approval. To ensure safety, the auto-approval feature is disabled by default. To enable auto-approval, you need to actively set in a pre-defined configuration file the following: ``` [pr_reviewer] enable_auto_approval = true ``` (this specific flag cannot be set with a command line argument, only in the configuration file, committed to the repository) You can also enable auto-approval only if the PR meets certain requirements, such as that the `estimated_review_effort` is equal or below a certain threshold, by adjusting the flag: ``` [pr_reviewer] maximal_review_effort = 5 ``` |
More PR-Agent commands> To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: > - **/review**: Request a review of your Pull Request. > - **/describe**: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. > - **/improve [--extended]**: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. > - **/ask \ |
…sh or https) and/or .git suffix