search

hbmartin / danger-spm_version_updates

A Danger plugin to detect if there are any updates to your Swift Package Manager dependencies.
https://hbmartin.github.io/danger-spm_version_updates/Danger/DangerSpmVersionUpdates.html
MIT License
5 stars 1 forks source link

Support version 1 of Package.resolved #4

Closed hbmartin closed 3 months ago

hbmartin commented 3 months ago

@CodiumAI-Agent /review

codecov[bot] commented 3 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 95.03%. Comparing base (ebcc5e5) to head (eff9651).

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #4 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 94.96% 95.03% +0.07% ========================================== Files 5 5 Lines 139 141 +2 ========================================== + Hits 132 134 +2 Misses 7 7 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

CodiumAI-Agent commented 3 months ago

PR Review

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5] 3, because the PR introduces significant logic to handle different versions of Package.resolved files, which requires careful review to ensure compatibility and correctness. The addition of tests and fixture files increases the complexity of the review.
🧪 Relevant tests Yes
🔍 Possible issues Possible Bug: The logic to merge versions from multiple resolved_paths assumes that there are no duplicate packages across these paths. If duplicates exist, this could lead to unexpected behavior.
🔒 Security concerns No
Code feedback:
relevant filelib/spm_version_updates/xcode.rb
suggestion       Consider adding error handling for JSON parsing to gracefully handle malformed JSON files. This can prevent the entire process from failing due to a single corrupt Package.resolved file. [important]
relevant linecontents = JSON.load_file!(resolved_path)
relevant filelib/spm_version_updates/xcode.rb
suggestion       It might be beneficial to abstract the logic of extracting pins from the contents into a separate method. This can improve readability and make the code more modular. [medium]
relevant linepins = contents["pins"] || contents["object"]["pins"]
relevant filelib/spm_version_updates/xcode.rb
suggestion       Consider validating the existence of "state", "version", and "revision" keys in the pin hash to avoid potential `NoMethodError` for nil values. [important]
relevant linepin["state"]["version"] || pin["state"]["revision"],
relevant filespec/spm_version_updates_spec.rb
suggestion       To ensure robustness, add more test cases covering scenarios such as empty pins array, missing "version" or "revision" keys, and malformed JSON structure. [medium]
relevant lineit "Reports new versions for version=1 Package.resolved" do
✨ Review tool usage guide:
**Overview:** The `review` tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered [automatically](https://pr-agent-docs.codium.ai/usage-guide/automations_and_usage/#github-app-automatic-tools-when-a-new-pr-is-opened) every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR. When commenting, to edit [configurations](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/pr_agent/settings/configuration.toml#L19) related to the review tool (`pr_reviewer` section), use the following template: ``` /review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=... ``` With a [configuration file](https://pr-agent-docs.codium.ai/usage-guide/configuration_options/), use the following template: ``` [pr_reviewer] some_config1=... some_config2=... ```
Utilizing extra instructions
The `review` tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize. Examples for extra instructions: ``` [pr_reviewer] # /review # extra_instructions=""" In the 'possible issues' section, emphasize the following: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """ ``` Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.
How to enable\disable automation
- When you first install PR-Agent app, the [default mode](https://pr-agent-docs.codium.ai/usage-guide/automations_and_usage/#github-app-automatic-tools-when-a-new-pr-is-opened) for the `review` tool is: ``` pr_commands = ["/review", ...] ``` meaning the `review` tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration. Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations
Auto-labels
The `review` tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR: - a `possible security issue` label, that detects possible [security issues](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/tr/user_description/pr_agent/settings/pr_reviewer_prompts.toml#L136) (`enable_review_labels_security` flag) - a `Review effort [1-5]: x` label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (`enable_review_labels_effort` flag)
Extra sub-tools
The `review` tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR. It is recommended to review the [possible options](https://pr-agent-docs.codium.ai/tools/review/#enabledisable-features), and choose the ones relevant for your use case. Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example: `require_score_review`, `require_soc2_ticket`, `require_can_be_split_review`, and more.
Auto-approve PRs
By invoking: ``` /review auto_approve ``` The tool will automatically approve the PR, and add a comment with the approval. To ensure safety, the auto-approval feature is disabled by default. To enable auto-approval, you need to actively set in a pre-defined configuration file the following: ``` [pr_reviewer] enable_auto_approval = true ``` (this specific flag cannot be set with a command line argument, only in the configuration file, committed to the repository) You can also enable auto-approval only if the PR meets certain requirements, such as that the `estimated_review_effort` is equal or below a certain threshold, by adjusting the flag: ``` [pr_reviewer] maximal_review_effort = 5 ```
More PR-Agent commands
> To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: > - **/review**: Request a review of your Pull Request. > - **/describe**: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. > - **/improve [--extended]**: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. > - **/ask \**: Ask a question about the PR. > - **/update_changelog**: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents. > - **/add_docs** 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR. > - **/generate_labels** 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents. > - **/analyze** 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component. >See the [tools guide](https://pr-agent-docs.codium.ai/tools/) for more details. >To list the possible configuration parameters, add a **/config** comment.
See the [review usage](https://pr-agent-docs.codium.ai/tools/review/) page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.