hbmartin / danger-spm_version_updates

A Danger plugin to detect if there are any updates to your Swift Package Manager dependencies.
https://hbmartin.github.io/danger-spm_version_updates/Danger/DangerSpmVersionUpdates.html
MIT License
5 stars 1 forks source link

Ignore packages with commit instead of version #8

Open hbmartin opened 2 months ago

hbmartin commented 2 months ago

@CodiumAI-Agent /review

CodiumAI-Agent commented 2 months ago

PR Review

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5] 3, because the PR involves changes across multiple files with modifications in both logic and structure. The changes include refactoring, error handling improvements, and new method extractions which require careful review to ensure functionality remains consistent and error handling is robust.
🧪 Relevant tests Yes
🔍 Possible issues Error Handling: The new error handling in `warn_for_new_versions_range` and `warn_for_new_versions` captures exceptions but only logs them to stderr. This might not be sufficient for all deployment environments where more sophisticated error reporting or handling might be necessary.
🔒 Security concerns No
Code feedback:
relevant filelib/spm_version_updates/git.rb
suggestion       Consider using `sort_by` instead of `sort!` for better performance when sorting complex objects or when the sorting criteria might become more complex in the future. [medium]
relevant lineversions.sort!.reverse!

relevant filelib/spm_version_updates/plugin.rb
suggestion       Extract the repeated error handling logic into a separate method to reduce duplication and improve maintainability. [important]
relevant linerescue ArgumentError => e

relevant filelib/spm_version_updates/plugin.rb
suggestion       Consider implementing a retry mechanism or a more sophisticated error recovery strategy in the new `warn_for_branch` method to handle transient issues when fetching the last commit. [medium]
relevant linelast_commit = Git.branch_last_commit(repository_url, branch)

relevant filelib/spm_version_updates/plugin.rb
suggestion       Use a more descriptive variable name than `e` in the rescue blocks to improve code readability and maintainability. [medium]
relevant linerescue ArgumentError => e


✨ Review tool usage guide:
**Overview:** The `review` tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review which includes several types of feedbacks, such as possible PR issues, security threats and relevant test in the PR. More feedbacks can be [added](https://pr-agent-docs.codium.ai/tools/review/#general-configurations) by configuring the tool. The tool can be triggered [automatically](https://pr-agent-docs.codium.ai/usage-guide/automations_and_usage/#github-app-automatic-tools-when-a-new-pr-is-opened) every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR. - When commenting, to edit [configurations](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/pr_agent/settings/configuration.toml#L23) related to the review tool (`pr_reviewer` section), use the following template: ``` /review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=... ``` - With a [configuration file](https://pr-agent-docs.codium.ai/usage-guide/configuration_options/), use the following template: ``` [pr_reviewer] some_config1=... some_config2=... ``` See the review [usage page](https://pr-agent-docs.codium.ai/tools/review/) for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.
codecov[bot] commented 2 months ago

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 81.81818% with 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 93.83%. Comparing base (a36af65) to head (e860ceb).

Files Patch % Lines
lib/spm_version_updates/plugin.rb 80.00% 2 Missing :warning:
Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #8 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 95.07% 93.83% -1.24% ========================================== Files 5 5 Lines 142 146 +4 ========================================== + Hits 135 137 +2 - Misses 7 9 +2 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.