Tweak details view - Githubissues

fsteeg commented 7 years ago

[ ] emphasize fulltext link (icon, header)
[ ] compact table
[ ] resource name as page title (displayed in browser tab)
[ ] display subjects label only if there are any: http://dd.lobid.org/collections/j_m_r_lenz.uni-ma.ma.de

acka47 commented 7 years ago

Also:

[ ] Don't show id field
[ ] Improve order

acka47 commented 7 years ago

Generally, we should merge information on digitized and the printed source resources into one entry. So that we only have "Sammlungen" and "Titel" (probably with another term) as main types. This is also on the search level. I better make a separate issue for this, shouldn't I?

A start would be to remove the hasFormat isFormatOf information from the detail view and do some restructuring.

SBRitter commented 7 years ago

And:

[ ] Add collection to print/digital view

fsteeg commented 7 years ago

For reference, a details page in the old system: http://web.archive.org/web/20130327065029/http://www.digitalisiertedrucke.de/record/491272?ln=de

fsteeg commented 7 years ago

Deployed to staging, see:

http://test.digitalisiertedrucke.de/resources/P323128 http://test.digitalisiertedrucke.de/collections/pressedienst_1946-1995.fes.bn.de

acka47 commented 7 years ago

The order of metadata elements for collections should be improved. For reference:

Old version: http://web.archive.org/web/20100213014249/http://www.digitalisiertedrucke.de/record/46777?ln=de New version: http://test.digitalisiertedrucke.de/collections/drucke_reformationszeit.sl.wb.de

acka47 commented 7 years ago

Also http://web.archive.org/web/20100213014337/http://www.digitalisiertedrucke.de/record/46780?ln=de vs. http://test.digitalisiertedrucke.de/collections/druckwerke_leibnizzeit.hab.wf.de. What I noticed is:

We display data that wasn't displayed in the old version: Sprache, Umfang (While "Sprache" is important we should probably remove extent information from collections.)
We don't display data that was in the old version: Digitalisierungszeitraum, Zeitliche Abdeckung, Ansprechpartner (We should look where the info on Digitalisierungszeitraum and temporal coverage went during transformatuion and add it.)

fsteeg commented 7 years ago

Why remove the extent information from collections? Seems useful.

For missing data: #38

Tweaked order deployed to staging:

http://test.digitalisiertedrucke.de/collections/einblattdrucke.vd17.oo.de http://test.digitalisiertedrucke.de/collections/drucke_reformationszeit.sl.wb.de http://test.digitalisiertedrucke.de/collections/archaeologische_funde.hab.wf.de

Compare to:

http://web.archive.org/web/20100213014352/http://www.digitalisiertedrucke.de/record/46783?ln=de http://web.archive.org/web/20100213014249/http://www.digitalisiertedrucke.de/record/46777?ln=de http://web.archive.org/web/20100213014342/http://www.digitalisiertedrucke.de/record/46781?ln=de

Two ideas for new issues based on the old versions: