Closed acka47 closed 6 months ago
Is there any update on this? I don't have access to the DNB Jira, so I can't check myself.
Is there any update on this?
Not yet. I have forwarded your question as this JIRA comment:
Ich leite mal die Frage des VZG-Kollegen Stefan Peters weiter: Gibt es hier irgendwelche Entwicklungen oder auch Angaben zum Zeitpunkt der geplanten Umsetzung?
DNB responded quickly and positively:
die Anforderungen für die Ausgabe in RDF sind erstellt (Ticket: ILT-8227 ist mit diesem Ticket verknüpft, hast Du Zugriff drauf?). Wenn alles gut geht, werden die Anforderungen im Import/Export-Release 2023.03 umgesetzt (Priorisierungstermin findet Anfang Mai statt). Go-live für die Export-Formate ist der 26.09.2023.
Update from DNB:
Die Änderung wurde produktiv genommen. Siehe https://d-nb.info/gnd/4427720-9/about/lds Beim nächsten Dump (Ende Oktober/Anfang November) ist die Änderung dann auch mit drin.
For implementing this, a new property was added to GND ontology: gndo:usingInstructions
(see also the version notes of the current GNDO version). I added it with https://github.com/hbz/lobid-gnd/commit/b8ee7976ac7838e987b31f5687878a7b22936726 and will open a PR.
With updates coming in that include the property https://d-nb.properties.info/standards/elementset/gnd#usingInstructions, we already get alert mails " Alert GND: found not compacted field(s)!":
On 13.10.23 01:04, sol wrote:
gnd_20221212.mappings.authority.properties.https://d-nb.properties.info/standards/elementset/gnd#usingInstructions.properties.@language.type gnd_20221212.mappings.authority.properties.https://d-nb.properties.info/standards/elementset/gnd#usingInstructions.properties.@language.fields.keyword.type gnd_20221212.mappings.authority.properties.https://d-nb.properties.info/standards/elementset/gnd#usingInstructions.properties.@value.type gnd_20221212.mappings.authority.properties.https://d-nb.properties.info/standards/elementset/gnd#usingInstructions.properties.@value.fields.keyword.type
I am hopeful, this will be solved by just updating the context as in #356.
I see that gndo:usingInstructions
is now part of the Lobid context. However, it doesn't seem like the values have been updated yet. Are there any entries with new updates that I can use to test this? When will old entries (see my original example) get the updated values?
Thanks!
Hi @stefandesu ,
thanks for asking. Unfortunately, my assumption above was wrong:
I am hopeful, this will be solved by just updating the context as in https://github.com/hbz/lobid-gnd/pull/356.
We will let you know tomorrow when some entries are on test that actually look like what you can expect in the future.
We will let you know tomorrow when some entries are on test that actually look like what you can expect in the future.
Unfortunately, no resource with 680 was added/modified, so there is no example yet, see https://test.lobid.org/gnd/search?q=_exists_%3AusingInstructions++AND+describedBy.dateModified%3A2023-11-02.
However, it will just be an array of strings, e.g. in https://test.lobid.org/gnd/1269971174.json it will look like this:
{
"usingInstructions":[
"Weitere Titel ggf. auch unter dem Pseudonym bzw. dem wirklichen Namen"
]
}
@stefandesu usingInstructions
can now be found on production with the correct structure, see https://lobid.org/gnd/search?q=_exists_%3AusingInstructions&format=json
@acka47 Thanks a lot!
Done, see above and https://github.com/hbz/lobid-gnd/issues/366#issuecomment-1827875482 . Closing.
Reported via email by @stefandesu for Cocoda. I opened a corresponding Jira issue at DNB: https://jira.dnb.de/browse/GND-226
Am 07.12.22 um 11:56 schrieb Peters, Stefan: