Fix `@context` for `usingInstructions`& `professionOrOccupation`

[acka47]

Should finally resolve (partially) #333 . Might resolve (partially) https://github.com/hbz/lobid/issues/419 .

[fsteeg]

Deployed, will be used for tonight's updates. What about the professionOrOccupation errors?

[acka47]

What about the professionOrOccupation errors?

These might be fixed with https://github.com/hbz/lobid-gnd/pull/360/commits/1f10a4e4ddac0cc0ea812f98e5a2cf3caf3e6da8 . The respective issue is https://github.com/hbz/lobid/issues/419 (we should have moved that to the lobid-gnd repo, I always have trouble finding it).

[fsteeg]

Also deployed https://github.com/hbz/lobid-gnd/commit/1f10a4e4ddac0cc0ea812f98e5a2cf3caf3e6da8 for tonight's updates.

[fsteeg]

Pushed https://github.com/hbz/lobid-gnd/pull/360/commits/a06af85075fce419a47285c915c5e717b4721564, looks good for the tests. Deployed to the servers for nightly updates. We will still get the alert since the current test index will remain broken, but we should be able to check the updates. I've also triggered creating a new baseline index for testing, so we should be able to get an up-to-date index next week.

[acka47]

professionOrOccupation looks better now. In those records changed on Friday, the order looks good as well: https://test.lobid.org/gnd/search?q=describedBy.dateModified%3A2023-11-03+AND+_exists_%3AprofessionOrOccupation&format=json (Example: http://test.lobid.org/gnd/1308554133)

However, it does not look good for others but I guess, the changes only apply to the latest modifications, don't they?

Re. usageInstructions we had already seen that it works, hadn't weß? (But I can not find an example on test now to verify.)

[fsteeg]

However, it does not look good for others but I guess, the changes only apply to the latest modifications, don't they?

Yes, we will have to re-index updates into a clean index. I will test with the new test index I created, and if that works I will re-index the missing updates into the current production index.

[fsteeg]

Deployed updates to (new) test setup, no uncompacted fields, looks good:

• describedBy.dateModified:2023-11-01+AND+professionOrOccupation:*&format=json (order looks good too, e.g. 1308235011, 1308234414)

• http://test.lobid.org/gnd/search?q=usingInstructions:*

  (Note: test does not contain all data, only June basedump + updates since 2023-10-10; it's also in a weird state otherwise: the baseline data has the old professionOrOccupation structure, leading to empty arrays for those entries. Also the current EntityFacts dump caused an error, resulting in missing depictions etc. on test; all of this should not be relevant for the production setup, which had working updates before 2023-10-10, and is still using the full EntityFacts index.)

[acka47]

+1

[fsteeg]

Deployed to production, corresponding to the test links above:

• describedBy.dateModified:2023-11-01+AND+professionOrOccupation:*&format=json (order looks good too, e.g. 1308235011, 1308234414)
• http://lobid.org/gnd/search?q=usingInstructions:*

Will merge, but will remove the closing references before (https://github.com/hbz/lobid-gnd/issues/333, https://github.com/hbz/lobid/issues/419) since these will only be resolved after a new baseline.