Closed acka47 closed 5 years ago
Source snippet for the first example:
<datafield tag="902" ind1="-" ind2="2">
<subfield code="g">Nordrhein-Westfalen</subfield>
<subfield code="9">(DE-588)4042570-8</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="902" ind1="-" ind2="2">
<subfield code="s">Landkreis</subfield>
<subfield code="9">(DE-588)4073976-4</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="902" ind1="-" ind2="2">
<subfield code="f">Karte</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="903" ind1="-" ind2="2">
<subfield code="a">213</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="907" ind1="-" ind2="1">
<subfield code="g">Kreis Coesfeld</subfield>
<subfield code="9">(DE-588)4010356-0</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="907" ind1="-" ind2="1">
<subfield code="f">Karte</subfield>
</datafield>
For maps, we only want those 9-- fiels transformed with in2="1"
. What is typed as biboMap
is defined like this:
Seems ridiculous hard to achieve this. So my question is: it would be easy to just get rid of the superordinated subject chain in whole, for every resource. Would this be a solution?
+1
Fixed with #1024. Closing.
Reported by NWbib editor I.N. via email on 2019-08-02:
Am 02.08.19 um 16:08 schrieb I.N.: ...
Examples
http://lobid.org/resources/HT016642623
NWBib-Screenshot:
http://lobid.org/resources/HT015373288
NWBib-Screenshot: