610 Corporate Body subject (ALMA)

[TobiasNx]

610 - Nebeneintragung unter einem Schlagwort - Körperschaftsname (W)

e.g.HT003176544

<datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">Berlin</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">Bremen</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">Hamburg</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">Nordrhein-Westfalen</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">Niedersachsen</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">Rheinland-Pfalz</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">Saarland</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">Schleswig-Holstein</subfield>
  </datafield>

[dr0i]

Just wondering if Corporate Body subject should be typed as Concept. We use already Concept e.g. spatial.id:"https://nwbib.de/spatial#N20" which denote a SKOSified URI. But this is not the case for the Corporate Body subject which lacks any URIs to begin with and thus lacks any SKOSification.

[TobiasNx]

Since we have a subjects that do not count as "type": "complexSubject" or "type": "concept" we introduced "type": "keyword" as type for those subjects that do not have controlled vocabs. "type": "concept" will be used for SKOS and also for other concepts from controlled vocabularies even if they do not have an id.

[dr0i]

Will be deployed at Monday.

[dr0i]

Deployed, se e.g. http://alma.lobid.org/resources/search?q=HT020202475&format=json. Closed.