Closed acka47 closed 7 years ago
To keep this simple on the implementation side (and realistically add this for the launch), I suggest we build it just like the advanced search, to include all contributing agents (all roles, persons, corporations).
Roles which I would include | Roles which I wouldn't include |
---|---|
Creator, actor, screenwriter, componist, cinematographer (camera), cartograph, musician, photograph, performer, singer, publisher, issuing body and maybe engraver, illustrator, interviewer and interviewed person. | Introduction/Afterword, Bibliographic antecedent, collaborator, conductor, collector, contributor, director, dedicatee, honoured person, producer, redacteur. |
Otherwise, implement them all. If the one facet isn't enough, a second one will do the trick. And if for example a person searched for a director and earlier actor, if would be unlogical from the user perspective to only get the resources where the faceted person was an actor (Live thinking on GitHub! ;) )
Deployed to staging: http://stage.lobid.org/resources/search?q=ehrenfeld
I like very much (+1) and suggest to move the facet one up (after the "Erscheinungsjahr" facet and before the "Schlagwörter" facet).
Obviously, a new facet enables one to find more flaws in the application. Reviewing this, I noticed that http://stage.lobid.org/resources/search?q=generative+grammatik gives 42508 results, including 4073 by Homer (not Simpson) where I don't find neither of the search terms. But this is something for another issue...
+1 Also for moving the facet one position upwards.
I noticed that http://stage.lobid.org/resources/search?q=generative+grammatik gives 42508 results, including 4073 by Homer (not Simpson) where I don't find neither of the search terms.
"Homerus, Grammatiker": http://lobid.org/resources/HT009028375?format=json
Contributors can not be filtered after a search. Before implementing this, we have to decide two things: