Open acka47 opened 1 month ago
We should discuss whether rdfs:label
also needs adjustment.
What's wrong with this description? Except that ZDB titles are no longer assigned an hbz ID.
The Alma MMS ID is a vendor-specific identifier, the hbz ID is vendor-independent. At least in my understanding.
What's wrong with this description? Except that ZDB titles are no longer assigned an hbz ID.
The Alma MMS ID is a vendor-specific identifier, the hbz ID is vendor-independent. At least in my understanding.
I want to second that. Only records that are "truly" or were records in the "Verbundkatalog" get a hbzId. ALMA has a lot more records than the NZ/Verbundkatalog also CZ and local records. All of them have almaMmsId
s but none of them have a hbzId.
Here is the current description:
https://github.com/hbz/lobid-vocabs/blob/ae7b4144c057f0cf86ec408599e0666ded4fdca8/lobid-vocab.ttl#L393-L394
This isn't correct anymore as by now the Alma-MMS-ID is the main ID in the union catalogue. We will have to update the description.