Closed acka47 closed 7 years ago
This issue has the same underlying problem as #155. It's not that bad here as the bigger parts of the RDF description overwrite the smaller part (i.e. the hasFormat
triple).
After resolving #155 this issue is expected behaviour. I would like to have it open, though, with low priority. Someday the missing data resulting from resolving #139 should be made available again, I would say.
I would like to have it open, though, with low priority.
+1. Assigning this to you, as I won't resolve it.
Someday the missing data resulting from resolving #139 should be made available again, I would say.
Latest, when we implement #1 .
I can't reconstruct what is actually meant with hasFormat
. A value or a MAB field would help.
We removed hasFormat
from the context (see https://github.com/hbz/lobid-resources/issues/8#issuecomment-279723868) and, thus, we obviously don't need it. Closing.
See http://lobid.org/resource/HT016511663/about where the link is missing though it apperas in the test at https://github.com/lobid/lodmill/blob/master/lodmill-rd/src/test/resources/CT003012479.nt.