Closed acka47 closed 9 years ago
I doesn't seem useful for me to add the Periodical type – especially if it is incorrect. As we don't use bibo:Periodical
for facetting in NWBib, I suggest removing it completely. The same goes for bibo:Collection
in the context of ZDB resources.
I am working on this and will remove both types bibo:Periodical
and bibo:Collection
.
@literarymachine Felix, @jschnasse told me that he is generally inf avor of cleaning up the typing oin lobid and that you it whouldn't break edoweb. Nonetheless, I am mentioning you so that you know what is going on.
After removing the types Periodical
and Collection
you will only have the different types bibo:Series
and bibo:Journal
. (Some of these will be also typed as lv:Miscellaneous
. We will deal with this in another issue, see https://github.com/lobid/lodmill/issues/676.)
Deployed to test. And production.
Stumbled over this while investigating #155. When I read the morph correctly, all resources with a ZDB ID are typed as
bibo:Periodical
. This isn't right as there are also series in ZDB -– which are mostly not periodicals.Examples: