hcayless / P3-processing

1 stars 2 forks source link

section-Tagging #6

Closed lmaylein closed 2 years ago

lmaylein commented 3 years ago

The tagging of the chapters seems different to me (sometimes div/@type=section is missing, sometimes head is within div@type=epidoc). Is this one the right nesting of the tags?

            <div type="section">
               <head>3-4. Poll Tax Receipts from the Harthotes Archive</head>
               <div type="epidoc">
hcayless commented 3 years ago

It is different. editions 3 and 4 are grouped in the source document and have their own subheading. 1 and 2 are not treated that way.

lmaylein commented 3 years ago

I'm not sure I've got that right. There are only four sections in this article, namely those with the following headings?

@jcowey ?

hcayless commented 3 years ago

The "Table 1." heading is an error. That should be picked up as a table caption rather than a section heading. "3-4..." is correctly a section heading though (at least as the document is currently formatted).

hcayless commented 3 years ago

Apologies, I was confused by https://github.com/hcayless/P3-processing/blob/e3af1eed53e2dd7301849a1b5b1fc1553d8fded9/articles/ClaytorSmithWarga_FourPoll_TaxReceiptsTrial-3.xml#L67-L72, which I think is incorrect. That heading is a table caption, correctly handled in https://github.com/hcayless/P3-processing/blob/e3af1eed53e2dd7301849a1b5b1fc1553d8fded9/articles/ClaytorSmithWarga_FourPoll_TaxReceiptsTrial-2.xml#L67-L71 (I could be convinced that the whole thing should be wrapped in a <figure>). I think the correct section headings are:

<head>3-4. Poll Tax Receipts from the Harthotes Archive</head>

and

<head>Appendix: Rereading P.Mil. 12.9 (Claytor)</head>

By "correct", I mean correct given the input, not necessarily right. I do not think the table caption is a section heading though.

jcowey commented 3 years ago

https://github.com/hcayless/P3-processing/blob/main/articles/ClaytorSmithWarga_FourPoll_TaxReceiptsTrial-3.xml#L67-L72

            <div type="section">
               <head>Table 1. Poll Tax Receipts on Papyrus, 30 BCE – 37 CE<note place="foot" xml:id="ftn9" n="9">
                     <p style="text-align:; "> The two orders to issue poll-tax receipts, recently (re)edited by Hagedorn, should be considered together with these receipts: Hagedorn 2013 (n. 7).</p>
                  </note>
               </head>
               <table>

was a result of a change made by me to the mark up of the .docx file and then pushed through the processing. I mentioned this in #4. I had thought that the "Table 1. Poll Tax Receipts on Papyrus, 30 BCE – 37 CE" was a head and at the same level as the other head tags. One can argue about this, but maybe you are right, Hugh.

lmaylein commented 3 years ago

Okay, this is the table caption. Does this mean that there will also be sections (like this) without titles, which will then also not be listed in the table of contents?