nus-pe-bot
commented
1 year ago Team's Response
The ability to insert just the name is intended. It does not make it harder to track the buyer/seller since this does not prevent the user from inserting their contact information. If the user chooses not to do this or to delay this, then enforcing the insertion of contact information might hinder the user instead.
Default values do indeed lack the quality of being very noticeably default values, but this was not a priority as they still are sufficiently so when looked at closely.
Items for the Tester to Verify
:question: Issue response
Team chose [response.NotInScope]
- [ ] I disagree
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
## :question: Issue type Team chose [`type.FeatureFlaw`] Originally [`type.FunctionalityBug`] - [ ] I disagree **Reason for disagreement:** [replace this with your explanation]
## :question: Issue severity Team chose [`severity.VeryLow`] Originally [`severity.Medium`] - [x] I disagree **Reason for disagreement:** This is not just a cosmetic issue. If the user decides to search for the address by Singapore, the search result will be bombarded with the default values. This does hinder the usage of the app for users. While a compromise on low is possible, I dont think its a VeryLow. Also, I do believe that just adding a persons name is insufficient, especially in the cases where the data is looked into after a period of time. The reason the buyer/seller is added is unknown and there will be no contact info recorded should you want to try to reach them. Maybe make at least one contact field compulsory?
Inserting just the name doesnt sound like a good idea. At least the contact information should be compulsory. It is harder to track the buyer/seller if the only information in the app is their name. Also default values can be something that actually causes errors or field can be left blank to prevent it from being taken seriously