Closed bkonkle closed 7 years ago
Not quite, the problem is that operators must be declared as aliases, but here I'm trying to bind one by calling it ‘-<‘ without using an alias. I'd fix it just by calling it f
instead.
Oh, that makes total sense! I didn't realize that by using them in pattern matching it was actually introducing them to the local scope. I'll send a PR your way this (US) morning. 👍
Okay, looks like the following dependencies need to be updated as well:
I think the latest on this is:
purescript-benchotron
purescript-datetime
added support for 0.9.1
in v1.0.0
purescript-node-fs
0.9.1 support is waiting on https://github.com/purescript-node/purescript-node-fs/pull/30purescript-node-fs
0.9.1 support is waiting on https://github.com/purescript-node/purescript-node-fs/pull/30purescript-quickcheck-laws
added support for 0.9.1
in v1.0.0
purescript-node-fs
is good to go, 1.0.0
was released today.
Currently still blocked by purescript-node-readline
-> purescript-benchotron
.
Fixed in #26 (kind of, we skipped over 0.9.x in the end).
0.9.1 has a problem with FingerTree. 😅
Is it incorrectly interpreting this as a record update and then rejecting it because of the deprecated syntax?
Thanks for any help you can provide!