Closed rly closed 4 years ago
If the Index
type is unused, then we may want to remove it. I don't think anyone is using it so it should be save to remove. Is that correct @ajtritt
If the Index type is unused, then we may want to remove it.
Agreed. It's not used anywhere else.
Fixed. I also removed: https://github.com/hdmf-dev/hdmf-common-schema/blob/9b159ef7d0989f7c92229b2a6c4c02c93ecee69b/common/table.yaml#L151-L153
which is now redundant.
Fixed. I also removed:
I think it would be useful then to update the doc for DynamicTable to describe that VectorData may be indexed by VectroIndex to create ragged array columns and that the name of the VectorIndex is expected to be the same as the VectorData followed by the _index
. The main reason is, that when removing VectorIndex as an explicit include the ability create ragged columns becomes a bit of "hidden" feature in the schema (even though formally nothing changes).
I updated the docstrings for DynamicTable
and VectorIndex
. Please re-review
Looks good to me. Good luck with the API changes....
Summary of changes
PR Checklist
docs/source/format_release_notes.rst