Fix #127 update paralle write test to set table ids

[oruebel]

Motivation

Fix #127 update parallel write test to set table ids when all columns are iterators

How to test the behavior?

Run pytest on the dev branch using HDMF on dev

Checklist

• [x] Did you update CHANGELOG.md with your changes?
• [X] Have you checked our Contributing document?
• [X] Have you ensured the PR clearly describes the problem and the solution?
• [X] Is your contribution compliant with our coding style? This can be checked running ruff from the source directory.
• [X] Have you checked to ensure that there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same change?
• [X] Have you included the relevant issue number using "Fix #XXX" notation where XXX is the issue number? By including "Fix #XXX" you allow GitHub to close issue #XXX when the PR is merged.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Comparison is base (7e1a82e) 85.66% compared to head (2ab6711) 85.66%.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## dev #128 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 85.66% 85.66% ======================================= Files 13 13 Lines 3139 3139 ======================================= Hits 2689 2689 Misses 450 450 ``` | [Files](https://app.codecov.io/gh/hdmf-dev/hdmf-zarr/pull/128?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=hdmf-dev) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [tests/unit/test\_parallel\_write.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/hdmf-dev/hdmf-zarr/pull/128?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=hdmf-dev#diff-dGVzdHMvdW5pdC90ZXN0X3BhcmFsbGVsX3dyaXRlLnB5) | `98.57% <100.00%> (ø)` | |

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[mavaylon1]

@oruebel I'll approve this since the changes are minimal, but lets set up a time to talk about the parallel write after I take a look at what you and Cody have been doing.

[mavaylon1]

@oruebel Do you need to update the changelog?

[oruebel]

@oruebel Do you need to update the changelog?

Thanks @mavaylon1 . I updated the changlog. Since this PR only fixes an issue of a PR that is part of the same release, I only added an additional link to this PR for the corresponding item that was already in the CHANGLOG.