Closed meghalithic closed 1 year ago
@hlapp @johnbradley section 6 was more of notes for myself. It could probably be removed?
LGTM, one thing though I would insist putting somewhere in the usage section this line : Morphology_main.py [-h] [--metadata METADATA] [--morphology MORPHOLOGY] [--landmark LANDMARK] [--lm_image LM_IMAGE] input_image output_presence
@hlapp @johnbradley What do you think?
@thibaulttabarin I broke it out into separate sections. Is it better to have it all together?
putting somewhere in the usage section this line : Morphology_main.py [-h] [--metadata METADATA] [--morphology MORPHOLOGY] [--landmark LANDMARK] [--lm_image LM_IMAGE] input_image output_presence
I think that makes sense as a concise summary of the available options, perhaps best preceding (right before?) the documentation of each individual option.
@hlapp when I made edits it got rid of your comments...how do I see those?
when I made edits it got rid of your comments...how do I see those?
Just click on the "Outdated" marker, and it should expand to the original comment or edit suggestion.
@hlapp @johnbradley section 6 was more of notes for myself. It could probably be removed?
@megbalk I updated section 6 to be more generic, but feel free to remove if you don't feel these instructions are necessary.
@hlapp how does @johnbradley change look?
issue #40
updated the readme based on discussions at the workflow meeting and comments on issue 40 and PR #36