healthyregions / chicago-environment-explorer

ChiVes harmonizes & standardizes environmental data across dozens of sources to make it accessible for full exploration, alongside a growing list of resources on the Chicago Environment, cultivated by a community of curators.
8 stars 1 forks source link

Index Builder: Address feedback with CSS styling #137

Closed bodom0015 closed 3 months ago

bodom0015 commented 3 months ago

Problem

@shubhamk008 and I met last Friday to discuss the styling of the Index Builder

He shared a list of styling updates to improve the look and feel of the prototype and bring it more in line with the design on Figma

Approach

Addressed the Following feedback:

Select Indicators - Left side:

Select Indicators - Right side:

Select Indicators - Bottom:

Choose Weights - Left Side:

Choose Weights - Right side:

Summary&Map - Left side:

TODO

Ask for feedback about/discuss these:

Screenshots

Screenshot 2024-03-15 at 3 13 11 PM

Screenshot 2024-03-15 at 3 13 32 PM

Screenshot 2024-03-15 at 3 13 24 PM

Screenshot 2024-03-15 at 3 13 40 PM

Screenshot 2024-03-15 at 3 13 51 PM

How to Test

  1. Navigate to https://deploy-preview-137--chicago-env-explorer.netlify.app/builder
  2. Step through the index builder and note the style changes above
  3. Provide further feedback on styling updates/changes as needed :pray:
netlify[bot] commented 3 months ago

Deploy Preview for chicago-env-explorer ready!

Name Link
Latest commit 624c11c0c1c13a5b9aed9ade8c465452d5cdba8f
Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/chicago-env-explorer/deploys/6601bf0f0804960008603112
Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-137--chicago-env-explorer.netlify.app
Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

bodom0015 commented 3 months ago

Thank you @mradamcox, that sounds perfect :+1:

I can definitely work next week only the final bits to adjust "Custom Index" to "Custom Vulnerability Index" and add an accordion that explains these calculations (including directionality and the other custom bits we've added recently).

One of the other last remaining bits is to try to clarify weights vs percentages for the sliders - one suggestion was to change the min/max on the sliders to 0.1 - 10.0 (with a step size of 0.1). This way, we get the same granularity as we have now, but the values should make it more clear that these weights are not exactly percentages. Alternatively, we could include another accordion that explains how we calculate the weight maximum and that should make it more clear that since weightMax is not always 100, the numbers provided will not always match the pie chart percentages

mradamcox commented 3 months ago

Looks good, I've made a new ticket to cover the extra text descriptions here, so I think it's time to merge this.