healthysustainablecities / global-indicators

An open-source tool for calculating spatial indicators for healthy, sustainable cities worldwide using open or custom data.
MIT License
83 stars 33 forks source link

peer review of analyses prior to acceptance #279

Open moudon opened 1 year ago

moudon commented 1 year ago

I agree that we do need to think about and devise "a mechanism for peer review of analyses prior to acceptance into the Global Observatory of Healthy and Sustainable Cities,"

carlhiggs commented 1 year ago

Thanks for opening this issue Anne, as per discussion #278 , I believe @mdlowe @deeptiadlakha are also developing a protocol for this for the policy review. It would be great to see if we could coordinate these somehow, as there may be some overlaps in the process. Let's leave this issue open as a reminder to continue this discussion :)

moudon commented 1 year ago

Hello Carl et al. We definitely want to link the policy and spatial indicator reviews. Keeping the issue open until we have multiple applications within a short period of time makes sense—we want and can handle more participants! Anne

Sent from Mailhttps://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986 for Windows

From: Carl @.> Sent: Monday, May 15, 2023 6:10 PM To: @.> Cc: Anne Vernez @.>; State @.> Subject: Re: [global-healthy-liveable-cities/global-indicators] peer review of analyses prior to acceptance (Issue #279)

Thanks for opening this issue Anne, as per discussion #278https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/global-healthy-liveable-cities/global-indicators/discussions/278__;!!K-Hz7m0Vt54!jrvZdy4-F1DDmPpf-WMoYrigSRJ8Qj5BMdpBzL9UGlu_j7kmH5bzDWyJL-7wegYcZQHCif5zJOw0dHHAq-UkaA$ , I believe @mdlowehttps://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/mdlowe__;!!K-Hz7m0Vt54!jrvZdy4-F1DDmPpf-WMoYrigSRJ8Qj5BMdpBzL9UGlu_j7kmH5bzDWyJL-7wegYcZQHCif5zJOw0dHFRckSk6A$ @deeptiadlakhahttps://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/deeptiadlakha__;!!K-Hz7m0Vt54!jrvZdy4-F1DDmPpf-WMoYrigSRJ8Qj5BMdpBzL9UGlu_j7kmH5bzDWyJL-7wegYcZQHCif5zJOw0dHHV3p2WHg$ are also developing a protocol for this for the policy review. It would be great to see if we could coordinate these somehow, as there may be some overlaps in the process. Let's leave this issue open as a reminder to continue this discussion :)

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/global-healthy-liveable-cities/global-indicators/issues/279*issuecomment-1548823888__;Iw!!K-Hz7m0Vt54!jrvZdy4-F1DDmPpf-WMoYrigSRJ8Qj5BMdpBzL9UGlu_j7kmH5bzDWyJL-7wegYcZQHCif5zJOw0dHHHNcAJaA$, or unsubscribehttps://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A547XT2HG6A7JI3BEKHUPFTXGLHVPANCNFSM6AAAAAAYCOTTVU__;!!K-Hz7m0Vt54!jrvZdy4-F1DDmPpf-WMoYrigSRJ8Qj5BMdpBzL9UGlu_j7kmH5bzDWyJL-7wegYcZQHCif5zJOw0dHEBcnFhWg$. You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.Message ID: @.***>