Closed VisLab closed 1 month ago
Thanks! I had a look at everything, it was a bit easier with the schema viewer. Most of the issues are typos, or in case of the morpheme stuff, I at some point changed morpological property with morpheme property and this was not adjusted in the parent tags. The pronoun had itself as a parent, which was likely a copy paste error.
I am not sure how I should go about updating these things now?
Do a pull from hed-schemas/develop to make sure your branch is up to date. Then make the corrections in the Tag.tsv file. (Don't touch the EquivalentTo as it is generated). Do a PR. Just change the .tsv file. Do not edit anything else. The mediawiki and xml will be regenerated as will the tsv. The system reads the information into a common data structure and then if no errors, writes it out in all formats, cleaning up stuff like white space.
@IanCa anything else to add?
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 7:44 AM Monique Denissen @.***> wrote:
Thanks! I had a look at everything, it was a bit easier with the schema viewer. Most of the issues are typos, or in case of the morpheme stuff, I at some point changed morpological property with morpheme property and this was not adjusted in the parent tags. The pronoun had itself as a parent, which was likely a copy paste error.
I am not sure how I should go about updating these things now?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/hed-standard/hed-schemas/issues/213#issuecomment-2188836561, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJCJOVL4DHFXGOZXGQ4653ZJFQY7AVCNFSM6AAAAABJ2MR7N2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCOBYHAZTMNJWGE . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
The initial prerelease was successful. Additional reviews will be posted in a new issue
@monique2208
First review -- just structural questions?
Burmese --> maybe under language?
Morphene-type, Free-morpheme-type, Bound-morphene-type maybe as a subcategory of Morphene-property. Morpheme-function is that also a Morphene property?
Should various things Morphological go under a Morphological-property? Also Morphological-position? is Morphological-property a Language-item-property?
Should there be a Part-of-speech category with all that Pronoun stuff going under it?