Rather than using the genSmallNonEmptyList that storableGetSet does, storableSetGetgenerates the length of the list independently, and then uses that number to generate its array of test objects. However, it does so in a way that allows empty lists, which then throw everything off culminating in malloc errors crashing the test suite. The solution seems to be simply changing the 0 on that line to 1; I didn't want to go through an entire branch+PR cycle for a single-byte change.
chessai
commented
5 years ago
Rather than using the
genSmallNonEmptyListthatstorableGetSetdoes,storableSetGetgenerates the length of the list independently, and then uses that number to generate its array of test objects. However, it does so in a way that allows empty lists, which then throw everything off culminating inmallocerrors crashing the test suite. The solution seems to be simply changing the0on that line to1; I didn't want to go through an entire branch+PR cycle for a single-byte change.